Legal Intersection of RCW Workers Compensation and Wrongful Discharge
Washington law permits an employee who is injured on the job to receive workers compensation benefits under the Revised Code of Washington (RCW) while also pursuing a wrongful discharge claim if the termination violates public policy, such as firing for filing a claim or for a workplace injury.
- Legal Intersection of RCW Workers Compensation and Wrongful Discharge
- When a Discharge Is Considered Wrongful Under the RCW
- Filing a Workers Compensation Claim
- Steps to Pursue a Wrongful Discharge Claim
- Potential Remedies
- Key Differences Between Workers Compensation and Wrongful Discharge Claims
- Practical Considerations for Employees
- Employer Responsibilities and Defenses
More from this site
Keep reading the latest coverage
When a Discharge Is Considered Wrongful Under the RCW
Wrongful discharge in the workers compensation context typically arises when an employer terminates an employee for one of the following protected reasons:
- Retaliation for filing a workers compensation claim or seeking benefits.
- Firing because the employee is unable to perform job duties due to a work‑related injury.
- Termination that breaches an implied contract or violates a collective bargaining agreement.
These actions contravene RCW 49.46.020, which safeguards employees from retaliation for exercising their compensation rights.
Filing a Workers Compensation Claim
To preserve rights, an injured worker must file a claim with the Washington State Department of Labor & Industries (L&I) within 180 days of the injury. The claim initiates an administrative process that determines eligibility for medical treatment and wage replacement.
Steps to Pursue a Wrongful Discharge Claim
Once a workers compensation claim is filed, the employee can also file a wrongful discharge lawsuit in state court. The procedural sequence generally includes:
- Documenting the termination, including dates, statements, and any written notices.
- Gathering evidence of the protected activity (e.g., claim filing receipts, medical reports).
- Consulting an attorney experienced in both workers compensation and employment law.
- Filing a complaint within the statute of limitations—typically three years for wrongful discharge in Washington.
Potential Remedies
Successful wrongful discharge actions may award:
- Back pay for lost wages.
- Front pay if reinstatement is impractical.
- Compensatory damages for emotional distress.
- Punitive damages when the employer acted with malice or reckless indifference.
Workers compensation benefits continue independently of the lawsuit, covering medical expenses and wage replacement.
Key Differences Between Workers Compensation and Wrongful Discharge Claims
| Aspect | Workers Compensation | Wrongful Discharge |
|---|---|---|
| Purpose | Provide no‑fault benefits for work‑related injuries. | Address employer retaliation or illegal termination. |
| Standard of Proof | Preponderance that injury is work‑related. | Preponderance that discharge violated public policy. |
| Damages | Medical costs, wage replacement, disability benefits. | Back pay, front pay, emotional distress, punitive damages. |
| Statute of Limitations | 180 days to file claim; benefits administered thereafter. | Generally three years from termination. |
Practical Considerations for Employees
Maintain thorough records of all communications with the employer and L&I. Promptly report injuries, seek medical care, and keep copies of all claim forms. Delays or missing documentation can jeopardize both compensation and the wrongful discharge case.
Employer Responsibilities and Defenses
Employers must avoid retaliatory actions and may defend a discharge by showing legitimate, non‑discriminatory reasons unrelated to the injury or claim. Documentation of performance issues, restructuring, or legitimate layoffs can be effective defenses, but they must be consistent and nondiscriminatory.